Archive for February, 2007

Sony Reader pages are gray

February 28, 2007

Posted by Ed:

Sony ReaderI had the chance to check out the new Sony Reader yesterday at my local Borders book store, and my daughter was with me. Consumers have longed for an ebook that has the look and feel of a page in a book. There’s something about holding the binding of a book and turning the pages  like we have done for ages. Making the transition to an electronic device for reading is difficult, and Sony is trying to accommodate that need with their new Sony Reader product.

Holding it in my hand, it felt as light or lighter than a paperback book. Navigation from page to page seemed intuitive and simple. Bookmarking pages was not easily understood right off the bat, but I’m sure I would have figured it out given a few more minutes. The text size was easily enlarged with the click of a button, so no need to buy the large print version of a book. It supports Memory stick and SD card memory as well, so the did the right thing with expandability. Overall I was impressed by this device for it’s usability. Then I tried to read a document and I wasn’t sure. I tried to read a page and something seemed different about it besides the obvious that it’s not a physical book. I wasn’t sure if I could handle reading an entire novel using this device. The $349.99 price tag seemed a bit high, but it may be worth it to a person who reads a lot of novels as long as the price of novels is not too high.

I then turned to my daughter and showed her the reader. I asked “does this look like you’re reading a book?” She replied “their gray pages, pages are white.” That said it all.

Barack Obama brings Web 2.0 to politics

February 27, 2007

Barack Obama has taken Web 2.0 to the political race. Whether you are a democrat or republican you have to hand it to Obama for setting up a great web 2.0 website. He has taken the political race to the next level by allowing constituents to advertise and campaign for him online. A glorified word of mouth campaign if you will. I signed up just to see what all the hub bub was about, and I gotta say it is set up well. I really like good user interface design, and I found the site very easy to understand and to use. Immediately I could find out where obama meetings and events were being held in my area, I have the ability to set up my own Obama blog if I like, I can learn more about where he stands on the issues, and I can even do my own fund raising for him (not that I want to.) This is a new and exciting time we live in where user generated content is king. Will I vote for him? I have no idea, I just think his website is done well. Check it out at http://www.barackobama.com/

Forward this to all your friends or you will have bad luck

February 26, 2007

Posted by Ed:

My uncle is a closet forwarder.   He constantly forwards me emails that he thinks I might like.  Consequently I have been trained by him to automatically delete any email with his name in the FROM field and the letters FW: in the subject of the email.  Rather sad because sometimes he sends emails that I need to know about (such as family events and goings on.)  He gets upset when I have not read the email, but I can’t stand having to read all 200 email addresses that he sent the email to before I get to the body of the message.  If I need to page down at all before reading a message I say forget it and hit the delete button.  So, if you like to forward email to a large list of people, I suggest using the bcc field to enter the email addresses.
Blind Carbon Copy (bcc) is a great way to send an email to a large amount of people, because no-one sees the whole list of email addresses.  Now, if the email has the words “Forward to all your friends or you will have bad luck” or something similar, then that is a different story all together.  Those emails are akin to spam as far as I am concerned.  Thanks for reading, and by the way, forward the link to this blog posting to 10 other people or you will have bad luck.

Free your mind

February 23, 2007

Posted by Ed:

Dumping my brain is a common task when I am trying to hash out a task, define a projects tasks, or prepare for a 2gnj episode. One of the techniques that I like to do involves mind mapping. You take the main idea and write it in the middle of the page, circle it, and then connect other ideas to it with lines. It’s a great way to hash out your ideas without losing them. I have been looking for a great way of doing this on the computer and have not found a good FREE solution until now. Lately I have been using Freemind for the task and it has been great. Below is an example I used for Episode 30: VOIP. Give it a try and let me know what you think.

FreeMind VOIP

SEO gaming spam and your internet soul

February 13, 2007

posted by: Joseph Hershey


As a registered domain and website, Two Guys Named Joe, Ed and I often receive email form letter requests from what appears to be either SEO / SEM firms, or ever industrious website owners.

The request goes something like this:

Dear Webmaster,

As far as link exchange is concern, we know that it is basically, a major factor for improving websites ranking. We would like to exchange links with your site.

could you please provide us your link details so that we can place your link at our web page
and pages associated with it.

We are thankful to you for putting our links on your site.we are requesting to you that mind telling us, where u have placed our link.

Our links information are as:

[ several sets of http links, etc ]

i’m egarly waiting for your response.

Thanks & regards
[ name and email address left out ]

This bites. I can imagine people really gig on this type of thing and exchange links back and forth with each other. It can come across as a potentially lucrative businesses setup with the expressed purpose of simply soliciting these types of exchanges on behalf of themselves, and / or their “clients”.

But how distasteful. This is worse than regular spam, and let me tell you why — because it takes two. It takes two to participate in this thing. It’s not just one guy sending you ads upon ads of unwanted cheap VIAGRA with hot stock tips. The criminal on the first part actively solicits active participation of the party on the second part. The party on the second part has to share in the game. And that’s where my brother has pulled me down to the gutter with him.

And how do you resist? There’s an implied promise for some nefarious rewards of higher search rankings, etc. Oh, and who doesn’t want that. That’s kind of like free sex to a site owner, no?

Now, I can only assume that when the sender presents themselves to be an SEO firm, like above, that either 1) they are, and they’re offering you a legitimate link to some page they have (it may be the only one they have, but it’s there for the purpose of receiving your incoming link), or 2) that they aren’t a legit business, just a fly by night scammer.

In the case of the fly by night scammer, they’re not really interested in linking to you, they just want to social engineer you into providing a link on your site (prominent placement is best). You and everyone that clicks on the link gets to a page full of ads or the like. Maybe the link itself isn’t a page, but just a direct click through in and of itself. And they get at least one click, one from you because you have to test it out, right?

In any case, I didn’t see myself smiling in that last bit at all. There’s nothing there for you. There’s no real royal Nigerian money waiting to be transferred safely into the United States.

Sigh.

If you’re wise, and you receive one of these emails, or one of it’s many variations, your first reaction is the like for the Nigerian 419 type scam — cringe, gag, and delete — not necessarily in that order.

Think about it.

You’re not the only one that got this email. Your email was scrapped from the web, or was on some list, or was a common one for domains, i.e. administrator@somedomain.com.

Being that you’re not the only one, there are some number of people who reciprocate with eager anticipation of more traffic. Yeah to higher traffic!! But the real winner is the “SEO firm”. They blanket email the world, and play the numbers game. They would seem to win no matter what the return rate is. .1% of the world’s email available email addresses is still quite a lot. Further, when they get 1 out of a 1000 returns, they get a link referring in to them per every 1000 spam sent. You, you get 1 referring link in. Not an even exchange anyway you look at it.

I can only picture some guy on my TV tube in the middle of the night…

MAKE MONEY FAST !! Put up your Adwords page, get lots of people to link to it in order to drive traffic to it, then drop out and surrender domain name registration before registrar company charges you for it.

NO MONEY DOWN !! We’ve done this and we’re millionaires !! We have a system. You can do this too !! Don’t wait, buy the system now. We do the email, we do the domain registration… blah blah blah

Can you say, “the only people making money fast here are the ones selling services to people who want to make money fast.”

Hmm, how about — Can you say Domain Kiting ?

Oh man. I thought I was special. I thought I could make money or get raise from my boss by working with these guys.

Unfortunately, nothing in all this is sounding good so far.

To digress briefly…

The link exchange you give means what to the likes of Google? (If you know search engine basics, skip to next paragraph.) They scour the net. They crawl around, looking for pages, and page links. From all of their trouble, they come up with keyword relevance search rankings for your page and everybody else’s page in reference to a set of content as captured by certain terms, or keywords, that one would use to find pages, or websites, with content like yours. The higher you rank, the more relevant (better) your site is suppose to be for the person searching for content. okay. enough on search and rank. The bottom line is the higher rank you have for keywords that drive traffic to your site, the higher your relevance is in the great blue sea of the internet and supposedly the higher traffic you have, the more eye balls you have looking at you, and the more profit you can glean from your site. Granted, profit may be measured in the amount of attention you get period, which has it’s side benefits.

Google is open to an extent to how they ascribe rank. They share the broad method and maybe a few specifics, just enough to gain people’s trust that their results mean anything — internet street cred.

With that, it’s the SEO’s job to get high rank for clients in exchange for money, or free sex, depending. If I’m wrong, tell me. But this is all I can figure out from these people. This is what they market and sell openly on their sites and marketing material. SEO’s sell internet discoverability of their clients by “optimizing” their clients content and participation in the internet community to promote their client’s visibility rank against a selected set of keywords deemed relevant to the client’s business and customers. The customers want to spend money, they search using keywords, your site is either up top and forward, or forever forgotten and lost in the mist of the internet cloud.

To some businesses, this is the difference between life and death. To some businesses, this is the difference between a good and bad year. To the lucky, this is not as heavy of an influence to the bottom line as word of mouth reputation.

To those that this means life and death, this type of SEO link sharing sounds like a good idea. Why not give them a link if they give me one too?

( Hmm, don’t the get rich quick with no effort no money down scams always work better on the highly motivated desperates ? )

Back to responding to the SEO spam creeps…

So what happens then, when you say “sure” and give ‘em what they ask for? You give ‘em a link, they get thousands. You have a link to a site that has content that has nothing to do with yours. They have lots of inward links from a lot of sites with content that has nothing to do with theirs. They get a boost in rank ratings to start. Google thinks twice to say these guys have undeserved links because their content has nothing to do with the site content referring into them, they’re black listed.

And you know what Google does with sites that link to or are linked from a black listed SEO gaming site? eeeeeek. Yep. You get black listed yourself. You are guilty by association. In the linked internet, you share to some extent the joys and sins of everyone else that’s associated with you. That’s how the Google deems referential integrity and rank standings in the community that is the cloud.

Did you get a boost from your single link in from the SEO ? I don’t think so. But after Google gets a whiff of their gaming, you sure do lose, maybe not to recover. How would you recover? You have to first realize what happened. Then you have to break all your out going links to them. They you have to request, and hope that they break their links to you. ( not likely ).

You might as well get yourself a new address and start over.

You sold your soul to the SEO devil.

Your search rank credit’s gone to crap.

You’re site’s credibility is bankrupt.

The only way out is through it, live the pain, own up to it, repent, ask forgiveness, and get a new website address and start over.

Yep sucker. Welcome to the SEO Lover’s 12 step program.

Oh, and by the way, don’t forget, everyone that loved your site and shared links to / from you, they’re de-listed too. They’re associated with you, a known SEO gamer, after all.

Sorry brothers. Your friends and family have to go to the ALANON equivalent for the SEO Lover’s 12 step program.

Don’t do it. Just say [delete] !!

—-

If you think I’m full of crap, let me know why. This is my best analysis on why you don’t want to respond to these seemingly enticing offers of free link sex on the internet road to hell.

If you agree with me, let me know that too. I haven’t heard a lot of people talking about this genre of sophisticated spam scam.

In the very least, don’t answer back to these people for the same reasons you don’t answer back to the Nigerians.

Just say [delete] !!

Vista security…

February 12, 2007

posted by: Joseph Hershey


So, Microsoft Vista and security.I don’t know. From what I’ve seen and heard since the 1st release to ‘business’ customers last November, Microsoft Vista doesn’t seem to be any more, or less secure for the average consumer than XP with service pack 2.

According to MS, here’s the Top 100 Reasons why everyone’s so speechless.

Security made it to #3.   Hmm.  I still don’t feel compelled to spend $$$.

What do you think?  Join the convo, share your vista thoughts as a comment to this blog post.

—-

p.s. as an aside, catch the “security” vid ad from the Mac boys…It’s a gas.

p.s.s. I’m going to a Microsoft Vista / Office 2007 / Exchange 2007 Ready Launch Event tomorrow.. Suppose to get all the good news on why I would Vista baby. Check out whether you can still get in somewhere near you…

I’ll let you know what I hear. I’ll be sure to ask the question directly to least a few MS softies:

“As a normal consumer, how would I know I’m actually more safe using MS products after having upgraded to V from XP2?”

Stay tuned.

1st and 10, Colts Win!

February 7, 2007

Posted by Ed:

I love football, and I love watching the year end event that ends in bowl and starts with super (since they trademarked it, I can’t type the word for the big game.)

The one technological advancement that I love about watching football is being able to see the 1st down line and the line of scrimmage. As I watched the game last week, i saw players step on the yellow line as if it was really there. Yet I know its computer generated. So how do they do it?

Sportvision is the company that provides the technology, and I think it is the bomb. The computing power and technical expertise to pull something like this off must be amazing and I want to learn more. How do they know where to put the line? How do they know when the camera zooms in to make the line bigger or smaller? How can they do it so quickly? So many questions I have about this technology. I want to know more. Stay tuned….

Tune in, turn on, and link out, baby

February 3, 2007

posted by: Joseph Hershey
—-

Hey, go take a read on Pando’s January 2007 newsletter. We’re featured at the bottom, “Podcasters Prefer Pando”.

Yeah for us. Yeah for Pando. Doesn’t Ed smile bright?

Here’s the original blog post which got them talking to us.

It was an honest share of how Pando, the free file sharing program solves a real problem for us sometimes when Ed and I are working to put a show together.

You may notice, though, a couple diffs between the copy on our blog said and what they had quoted from us… Hmm…now we know how it goes for the Hollywood writer…

It’s also too bad how they didn’t make some obvious link share to us. Seems like it would have been a natural to link on our picture, or even anywhere in the text. Simple as this.

Hmm… I don’t see any link outs to us on the whole shabang. Hmm…there is a link to a Pando Package with a sample 2gnj podcast included. To download the package and open it up, you have to install their software. How painful.

This could be an interesting case to highlight the differences in the methods and culture of what we call old and new media.

I leave it as an exercise for the reader to figure out which one you fit into, and why.

Here’s some clues to help get you started:

  • me me me vs. you you you
  • interruption marking vs. permission marketing — i.e. push email newsletters, broadcasting to a list of unknown emails, push a whole bunch of stuff you don’t want to hear to a broad undifferentiated numbers, hoping not to piss people off and hoping that the numbers game will work for you vs. pull subscription maintained by people who pull only what and when on information they choose to see
  • sticky sticky buy from here inward links only marketing vs. here’s a link out, or two, or three, or a million, we’re all friends here, what did you really want to find?
  • an economy of scarcity vs. an economy of abundance
  • change the other’s content in order to fit your message vs. link out and let the other people speak for themselves

The list goes on. so this is what i say — Tune in, turn on, and link out, baby.

Attention v. Content v. Access Controllers, who wins?

February 1, 2007

posted by: Joseph Hershey


Attention is the product of the new economy and Google has firmly monetized it with Adsense context ads and the like. Yahoo?   I don’t know so much about Yahoo.   I don’t Yahoo, and that may be your answer.

Let’s say, though, that I am a parent and I do want to find out some information about Disney’s first Snow White movie — the first full screen animated feature to play in the movie theaters.  I don’t want to buy anything.  I just want to get some reference material so I can complete this blog post.

If I go to Google to find it, either directly or indirectly. What do I get and where does it take me?

Ah, I see it. On the first page, right there. ( The first page, also known as the “front page” for old school media types who remember the newspaper, most likely has what I need to find in order to finish this post. )  Actually, the first link has what I need.  Excellent.  That’s why I like Google.  Easy, right up front results.  ( Not like when I grew up, when men were men and men had to tell the kid to get up and change the channel knob on the television… )

Did I lose you with the embedded parenthetical comments?  That’s not what Google does.  That’s why they win.

And that’s what people who spend their life searching for ways to optimize their information on the web so that they too show up as the first link, are looking for, the first, or the first few links, or at least on the first page or results:

Search Engine Optimization (SEO) and Search Engine Marketing (SEM), the search of how to change what you’re saying so that the most people can find you based on the methods and techniques / algorithms of a search engine.

Hmm, if I change what I am for you, then you control me = Google dominates.  Give that to your therapist this week…

Enough.  What’s the first link?  It’s a ref to somewhere on the wiki guide to the universe.  Ah, the clear winner for my (conscious) attention.

There’s also mention down below for the likes of imdb, amazon, and ebay.  If I wasn’t writing this post, though, I wouldn’t have really seen them.  No reason.  The winner, then, the first link up top, pretty well describes itself as something that takes me right where I need to go.  The others get honorable mention, and clearly have a few good seo’s and sem’s on their payroll.

Oh, and again, there was Adsense stuff, off to the side of the page.  I don’t think I paid much attention to it, only just enough to check to see if they were there because I was writing this post.  I think, though, if I wasn’t looking for ‘em, I’d still see ‘em, subliminally off to the side, in my periphery, where the subconscious takes over and you can’t talk it out of giving more seen advertisers the reward of brand recognition and uncontested loyalty based on human failures to distracted non thinking and laziness.

But I digress…hmm…guess I lost …

Attention.

Who wins then?  Is it Google with Adsense revenue, or is it Disney, who produced the original content, but didn’t get a chance to sell me anything, or is it the wiki world who tells me what it all means in the form of a seemingly credible encyclopedia for free?

It’s not so clear. Didn’t Disney already win? before I came to search for Snow White? They own Snow White and the dreams of my little girl to be a princess. Seems to me that today, the only cable channel my girl ever watches is 67, the Disney Channel.

Disney gets my daughter’s attention and impacts her self concept of what it means to be a girl, friend, daughter, sister, and person.

Ugh. If you own my daughter’s attention, you own her…you own me.  I allow it where I see it as okay and healthy.  I don’t allow it as her only source for info on how to be.

I think any parent has to hold onto responsibility and power to choose where you girl pays attention and learns.

But, again, I digress…hmm…

Attention.

hmm. Attention v. Content.

But wait, how about the companies that control my access to search and content, the internet service providers?  Don’t they control my access to the toll roads, my bridges, my way to commerce?  Don’t they have prime position to make beaucoup $$$?  Why aren’t they King?

Providers, like Comcast, are big, granted, but their revenues are capped off by fixed subscription rates.  After I pay the Comcast bill, I really don’t care that they exist when I go to find Google, Disney, or the source of what my girl pays so much attention to.

I give them attention once a month, when I pay the bill.  And let me tell you.  That’s bad attention in my book.  Like a junkie paying the dealer — you hate them because they own you.  Oh, they own me. Let me tell you.  I’m on the internet day in and out.

But if they own me why aren’t they the clear revenue winners over Google and Disney?

Government regulation.  Yeah for us!!

And it seems they want the government to step in again too, but this time to help them and their clogged tubes.  I refer you to Network Neutrality on the wiki guide to the universe.  There’s a fight going on right in our own back yard. Who’s got more money for lobbyists and how can we use this to distract from global warming and the war in iraq… It’s a fine time for the Democrats to announce creating presidential exploratory committees.

This fight isn’t dead.  No clear winner yet. Attention v. Content v. Access Controllers.

Hmm, the wiki guide to the unvierse.  I don’t see any Adsense type of distractions there.  How’d they get away with that? Hmm.  How do they show up as first on the list of gotos?  Hmm.  Wikinomics

Hmm, they tell me what things are, what the mean, who I am.

Maybe all wars aren’t fought in the usual mainstream world of capital.

Go figure.

Sorry, but I’m losing attention for the third time, and now I’m out.